Current:Home > MyNorth Carolina governor vetoes masks bill largely due to provision about campaign finance -TruePath Finance
North Carolina governor vetoes masks bill largely due to provision about campaign finance
View
Date:2025-04-20 12:31:33
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Despite changes made to North Carolina’s masking bill to quell concerns over the removal of a pandemic-era health exemption, Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper said he vetoed the legislation on Friday mostly for a different reason: a campaign finance provision tacked on to the end during legislative negotiations.
The bill now heads back to the state legislature. Republicans hold narrow veto-proof majorities at the General Assembly, which overrode all 19 of Cooper’s vetoes last year.
It’s Cooper’s third veto of the year, and GOP lawmakers have yet to take up override votes on his previous two this session — although they may come soon.
The original bill version that passed through the state Senate prompted significant criticism over its removal of an exemption to public masking laws passed in 2020 that allowed people to wear a mask for health purposes. The exemption’s removal would have technically made masking for health reasons illegal in the state.
While the strikethrough of one line caught most people’s attention, the majority of the bill focuses on increasing penalties for people who wear masks while committing a crime or intentionally block roadways in demonstrations. Republican legislators advanced the legislation this session in part as a response to the use of masks during widespread campus protests over the war in Gaza, including demonstrations on the Chapel Hill campus of the University of North Carolina.
The bill’s relatively smooth passage through the Senate stopped when it reached the state House, however, when Republican Rep. Erin Pare announced on X she wouldn’t vote for the bill without a health exemption. Because Republicans need every GOP vote to pass more polarizing legislation, the bill was sent to a committee of legislators to work out a compromise.
They reached a deal on the bill earlier this month, which notably added a health exemption for people who wear a “medical or surgical grade mask” to prevent the spread of disease. Law enforcement and property owners would also be allowed to ask someone to temporarily remove their mask to identify them under the new bill changes.
But another brand-new provision that caused outrage among Democratic legislators was the addition of a campaign donations clause that would allow wealthy donors to give money to special federal political organizations that can then send the money to state and county parties.
Cooper said in his veto statement that the legislation “created a gaping loophole for secret, unlimited campaign money” that could cause problems during an election year. He also said the legislation still does not fully protect people who wear masks for health reasons.
One of the bill’s sponsors, Robeson County Republican Sen. Danny Britt, said in a statement that Cooper’s veto encourages “bad actors” to wear masks to conceal their identity and not face consequences.
Republicans have also defended the election finance addition as necessary to remedy problems with a 2020 State Board of Elections advisory opinion that affirmed campaign giving limits but hamstrung groups like the Republican Governors Association from aiding the state party.
Senate Democrats refused to vote on the bill due to the provision, and House Democrats expounded upon their worries that the legislation would create a lack of financial transparency in lengthy debate last week.
The House and Senate expect to take up their veto overrides next week before they go on a possible indefinite hiatus to resolve budget issues.
veryGood! (1775)
Related
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Women now dominate the book business. Why there and not other creative industries?
- What the bonkers bond market means for you
- Beating the odds: Glioblastoma patient thriving 6 years after being told he had 6 months to live
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Inside Clean Energy: Yes, We Can Electrify Almost Everything. Here’s What That Looks Like.
- A Bridge to Composting and Clean Air in South Baltimore
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Save $291 on This Satchel Bag That Comes in 4 Colors
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Simone Biles Is Making a Golden Return to Competitive Gymnastics 2 Years After Tokyo Olympics Run
Ranking
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Hyundai and Kia recall 571,000 vehicles due to fire risk, urge owners to park outside
- Amazon releases new cashless pay by palm technology that requires only a hand wave
- ChatGPT is temporarily banned in Italy amid an investigation into data collection
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Alabama executes convicted murderer James Barber in first lethal injection since review after IV problems
- Madonna Hospitalized in the ICU With “Serious Bacterial Infection”
- Saudis, other oil giants announce surprise production cuts
Recommendation
Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
Fighting back against spams, scams and schemes
Warming Trends: Lithium Mining’s Threat to Flamingos in the Andes, Plus Resilience in Bangladesh, Barcelona’s Innovation and Global Storm Warnings
After the Wars in Iraq, ‘Everything Living is Dying’
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
Gas Stoves in the US Emit Methane Equivalent to the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Half a Million Cars
Fired Fox News producer says she'd testify against the network in $1.6 billion suit
Gas Stoves in the US Emit Methane Equivalent to the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Half a Million Cars