Current:Home > FinanceTrendPulse|Federal judge reimposes limited gag order in Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case -TruePath Finance
TrendPulse|Federal judge reimposes limited gag order in Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case
Oliver James Montgomery View
Date:2025-04-07 20:42:02
WASHINGTON (AP) — The TrendPulsefederal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case in Washington on Sunday reimposed a narrow gag order barring him from making public comments targeting prosecutors, court staff and potential witnesses.
The reinstatement of the gag order was revealed in a brief notation on the online case docket Sunday night, but the order itself was not immediately available, making it impossible to see the judge’s rationale or the precise contours of the restrictions.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is presiding over the federal case charging Trump with plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election, had temporarily lifted the gag order as she considered the former president’s request to keep it on hold while he challenges the restrictions on his speech in higher courts.
But Chutkan agreed to reinstate the order after prosecutors cited Trump’s recent social media comments about his former chief of staff they said represented an attempt to influence and intimidate a likely witness in the case.
The order is a fresh reminder that Trump’s penchant for incendiary and bitter rants about the four criminal cases that he’s facing, though politically beneficial in rallying his supporters as he seeks to reclaim the White House, carry practical consequences in court. Two separate judges have now imposed orders mandating that he rein in his speech, with the jurist presiding over a civil fraud trial in New York issuing a monetary fine last week.
A request for comment was sent Sunday to a Trump attorney, Todd Blanche. Trump in a social media post late Sunday acknowledged that the gag order was back in place, calling it “NOT CONSITUTIONAL!”
Trump’s lawyers have said they will seek an emergency stay of the order from the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. The defense has said Trump is entitled to criticize prosecutors and “speak truth to oppression.”
Trump has denied any wrongdoing in the case. He has made a central part of his 2024 campaign for president vilifying special counsel Jack Smith and others involved the criminal cases against him, casting himself as the victim of a politicized justice system.
Prosecutors have said Trump’s verbal attacks threaten to undermine the integrity of the case and risk inspiring his supporters to violence.
Smith’s team said Trump took advantage of the recent lifting of the gag order to “send an unmistakable and threatening message” to his former chief of staff, Mark Meadows, who was reported by ABC News to have received immunity to testify before a grand jury.
The former president mused on social media about the possibility that Meadows would give testimony to Smith in exchange for immunity. One part of the post said: “Some people would make that deal, but they are weaklings and cowards, and so bad for the future our Failing Nation. I don’t think that Mark Meadows is one of them but who really knows?”
In a separate case, Trump was fined last week $10,000 after the judge in his civil fraud trial in New York said the former president had violated a gag order.
___
Richer reported from Boston.
veryGood! (761)
Related
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Kate Hudson Proves Son Bing Is Following in Her and Matt Bellamy’s Musical Footsteps
- Up First briefing: State of the economy; a possible Trump indictment; difficult bosses
- Citing Health and Climate Concerns, Activists Urge HUD To Remove Gas Stoves From Federally Assisted Housing
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- Shop Amazon Prime Day 2023 Deals on Ninja Air Fryers, Blenders, Grills, Toaster Ovens, and More
- If You Bend the Knee, We'll Show You House of the Dragon's Cast In and Out of Costume
- Russia's nixing of Ukraine grain deal deepens worries about global food supply
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Delivery drivers are forced to confront the heatwave head on
Ranking
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Could the U.S. still see a recession? A handy primer about the confusing economy
- Annoyed With Your Internet Connection? This Top-Rated Wi-Fi Extender Is on Sale for $18 on Prime Day 2023
- The Capitol Christmas Tree Provides a Timely Reminder on Environmental Stewardship This Holiday Season
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Zayn Malik Reveals the Real Reason He Left One Direction
- Jenna Ortega's Historic 2023 Emmys Nomination Deserves Two Snaps
- Oil Companies Had a Problem With ExxonMobil’s Industry-Wide Carbon Capture Proposal: Exxon’s Bad Reputation
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Finding the Antidote to Climate Anxiety in Stories About Taking Action
A New Push Is on in Chicago to Connect Urban Farmers With Institutional Buyers Like Schools and Hospitals
Why Patrick Mahomes Says Wife Brittany Has a “Good Sense” on How to Handle Online Haters
Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
Proof Emily Blunt and Matt Damon's Kids Have the Most Precious Friendship
Oil Companies Had a Problem With ExxonMobil’s Industry-Wide Carbon Capture Proposal: Exxon’s Bad Reputation
House Republicans' CHOICE Act would roll back some Obamacare protections