Current:Home > reviewsArizona Republicans challenge Biden’s designation of a national monument near the Grand Canyon -TruePath Finance
Arizona Republicans challenge Biden’s designation of a national monument near the Grand Canyon
Surpassing View
Date:2025-04-08 21:40:00
The Arizona Legislature’s top two Republicans have challenged Democratic President Joe Biden’s creation of a new national monument last summer just outside Grand Canyon National Park, alleging he exceeded his legal authority in making that designation under a century-old law that lets presidents protect sites considered historically or culturally important. In a lawsuit filed Monday against Biden, Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen and House Speaker Ben Toma alleged Biden’s decision to designate the new monument under the 1906 Antiquities Act wasn’t limited to preserving objects of historic or scientific value and isn’t confined to the “the smallest area compatible with the proper care and management of the objects to be protected.”
The monument designation will help preserve 1,562 square miles (4,046 square kilometers) just to the north and south of Grand Canyon National Park. The monument, called Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni, turned a decadeslong vision for Native American tribes and environmentalists into a reality. Republican lawmakers and the uranium mining industry that operates in the area had opposed the designation, touting the economic benefits for the region while arguing that the mining efforts are a matter of national security.
“Biden’s maneuver is incredibly disingenuous, as it has nothing to do with protecting actual artifacts,” Petersen said in a statement. “Instead, it aims to halt all mining, ranching, and other local uses of federal lands that are critical to our energy independence from adversary foreign nations, our food supply and the strength of our economy.”
The White House and the U.S. Department of the Interior declined to comment on the lawsuit.
Mohave County and the northern Arizona communities of Colorado City and Fredonia also sued the Biden administration as part of the challenge.
The lawsuit says Mohave County and Colorado City will see a loss of tax revenue due to reduced mining activity and that the land-use restrictions that come from a monument designation will reduce the value of surrounding land, including State Trust Land, which produces incomes that benefits Arizona’s public schools and other beneficiaries.
The Interior Department, reacting to concerns over the risk of contaminating water, enacted a 20-year moratorium on the filing of new mining claims around the national park in 2012. No uranium mines are operating in Arizona, although the Pinyon Plain Mine, just south of Grand Canyon National Park, has been under development for years. Other claims are grandfathered in. The federal government has said nearly a dozen mines within the area that have been withdrawn from new mining claims could still potentially open. Just days after Biden made the designation in northern Arizona, a federal judge in Utah dismissed a lawsuit challenging the president’s restoration of two sprawling national monuments in the state that had been downsized by then-President Donald Trump.
The judge said Biden acted within his authority when he issued proclamations restoring Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments in 2021. Both monuments are on land sacred to many Native Americans.
veryGood! (79577)
Related
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- Beyoncé Reveals Blue Ivy Carter’s Motivation for Perfecting Renaissance Dance Routine
- Taylor Swift Subtly Supports Travis Kelce’s Record-Breaking Milestone
- Tatreez is a testament to the resilience and creativity of Palestinian women
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Contract between Puerto Rico’s government and coal-fired plant operator leaves residents in the dark
- Politics and the pulpit: How white evangelicals' support of Trump is creating schisms in the church
- Is it better to take Social Security at 62 or 67? It depends.
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- NFL playoff picture after Week 12: Ravens keep AFC's top seed – but maybe not for long
Ranking
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- McDonald's biggest moneymaker isn't its burgers. The surprising way it earns billions.
- Is it better to take Social Security at 62 or 67? It depends.
- Horoscopes Today, November 26, 2023
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- West Virginia removes 12-step recovery programs for inmate release. What does it mean?
- Great Lakes tribes’ knowledge of nature could be key to climate change. Will people listen?
- Hamas to release second group of Israeli hostages after hours-long delay, mediators say
Recommendation
Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
2024 NFL draft first-round order: New England Patriots in contention for top pick
College football coaching carousel: A look at who has been hired and fired this offseason
Bills players get into altercation with Eagles fans, LB Shaq Lawson appears to shove one
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Russian FM says he plans to attend OSCE meeting in North Macedonia
U.S. airlines lose 2 million suitcases a year. Where do they end up?
Michigan State Police places Flint post command staff on leave pending internal investigation