Current:Home > ScamsAmazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa -TruePath Finance
Amazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa
View
Date:2025-04-12 09:28:31
Amazon will pay more than $30 million in fines to settle alleged privacy violations involving its voice assistant Alexa and doorbell camera Ring, according to federal filings.
In one lawsuit, the Federal Trade Commission claims the tech company violated privacy laws by keeping recordings of children's conversations with its voice assistant Alexa, and in another that its employees have monitored customers' Ring camera recordings without their consent.
The FTC alleges Amazon held onto children's voice and geolocation data indefinitely, illegally used it to improve its algorithm and kept transcripts of their interactions with Alexa despite parents' requests to delete them.
The alleged practices would violate the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA, which requires online companies to alert and obtain consent from parents when they gather data for children under age 13 and allow parents to delete the data at will.
In addition to the $25 million civil penalty, Amazon would not be able to use data that has been requested to be deleted. The company also would have to remove children's inactive Alexa accounts and be required to notify its customers about the FTC's actions against the company.
"Amazon's history of misleading parents, keeping children's recordings indefinitely, and flouting parents' deletion requests violated COPPA and sacrificed privacy for profits," said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a statement. "COPPA does not allow companies to keep children's data forever for any reason, and certainly not to train their algorithms."
Until September 2019, Alexa's default settings were to store recordings and transcripts indefinitely. Amazon said it uses the recordings to better understand speech patterns and respond to voice commands, the complaint says.
After the FTC intervened at the time, Amazon added a setting to automatically delete data after three or 18 months, but still kept the indefinite setting as the default.
Amazon said in a statement it disagrees with the FTC's findings and does not believe it violated any laws.
"We take our responsibilities to our customers and their families very seriously," it said. "We have consistently taken steps to protect customer privacy by providing clear privacy disclosures and customer controls, conducting ongoing audits and process improvements, and maintaining strict internal controls to protect customer data."
The company said it requires parental consent for all children's profiles, provides a Children's Privacy Disclosure elaborating on how it uses children's data, allows child recordings and transcripts to be deleted in the Alexa app and erases child profiles that have been inactive for at least 18 months.
More than 800,000 children under age 13 have their own Alexa accounts, according to the complaint.
The FTC claims that when these issues were brought to Amazon's attention, it did not take action to remedy them.
In a separate lawsuit, the FTC seeks a $5.8 million fine for Amazon over claims employees and contractors at Ring — a home surveillance company Amazon bought in 2018 — had full access to customers' videos.
Amazon is also accused of not taking its security protections seriously, as hackers were able to break into two-way video streams to sexually proposition people, call children racial slurs and physically threaten families for ransom.
Despite this, the FTC says, Ring did not implement multi-factor authentication until 2019.
In addition to paying the $5.8 million, which will be issued as customer refunds, Ring would have to delete customers' videos and faces from before 2018, notify customers about the FTC's actions and report any unauthorized access to videos to the FTC.
"Ring's disregard for privacy and security exposed consumers to spying and harassment," Levine said. "The FTC's order makes clear that putting profit over privacy doesn't pay."
The proposed orders require approval from federal judges.
veryGood! (24)
Related
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Daniel Penny indicted by grand jury in chokehold death of Jordan Neely on NYC subway
- House Rep. Joaquin Castro underwent surgery to remove gastrointestinal tumors
- The science that spawned fungal fears in HBO's 'The Last of Us'
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Idaho Murder Case: Suspect Bryan Kohberger Indicted By Grand Jury
- This opera singer lost his voice after spinal surgery. Then he met someone who changed his life.
- Sydney Sweeney Knows Euphoria Fans Want Cassie to Get Her S--t Together for Season 3
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Vanderpump Rules Finale: Tom Sandoval and Raquel Leviss Declare Their Love Amid Cheating Scandal
Ranking
- Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
- Her husband died after stay at Montana State Hospital. She wants answers.
- Dakota Pipeline Protest Camp Is Cleared, at Least 40 Arrested
- LGBTQ+ youth are less likely to feel depressed with parental support, study says
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Why The Challenge: World Championship Winner Is Taking a Break From the Game
- In Charleston, S.C., Politics and Budgets Get in the Way of Cutting Carbon Emissions
- The Biggest Bombshells From Anna Nicole Smith: You Don't Know Me
Recommendation
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
Idaho dropped thousands from Medicaid early in the pandemic. Which state's next?
US Olympic ski jumper Patrick Gasienica dead at 24 in motorcycle accident
14 Creepy, Kooky, Mysterious & Ooky Wednesday Gifts for Fans of the Addams Family
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Clues to Bronze Age cranial surgery revealed in ancient bones
The impact of the Ukraine war on food supplies: 'It could have been so much worse'
Americans Increasingly Say Climate Change Is Happening Now